How CBS and the Writers Pulled Off Two Incredible Twists!
Girl, we got wigged at the gig! CBS and the team behind Matlock pulled not one but two fast ones on audiences and did it most ingeniously.
Kathy Bates is a liar, which makes us love her more! In all seriousness, I was flabbergasted by that twist at the end of the premiere. But now the series has another possible problem to deal with.
Since the pilot episode has been encored, everyone should be up to speed on the big twist of the Matlock reboot. In short, it’s not really a reboot or remake.
The question now is, how did the network, actors, and writers pull something so elaborate off? More importantly, how are viewers going to feel about this pivot?
The Culprit Is None Other Than The Creator Herself
If we’re going to play “The Blame Game,” then we need to start with the woman who wrote the pilot and developed the series, Jennie Snyder Urman.
The creator and showrunner told Deadline, “It was part of the original pitch. When I was thinking about what I would do if I were to adapt this title, I was like, what would be different?
“Of course, I was going to start with a female protagonist, but I didn’t want to just do a gender-swapped version that wasn’t interesting.
“So, I started to think that maybe she was using the name Matlock. I gave myself sort of a challenge. I can continue to tell the audience they’re underestimating her, but then they’re fooled at the end.”
So, even though the episode ends with a twist, it’s where the entire series started. That certainly explains why the setup was so perfectly crafted.
This gem of a Gemini has had her feet firmly planted in the entertainment industry for over twenty years. Suffice it to say, she’s put in the hours and worked on some incredible shows.
For instance, if you’ve ever watched Jane The Virgin, Reign, or Charmed, you’re already familiar with Urman’s work. This talented woman is a fan of female-led shows.
The Twists Have A Purpose Beyond Shock Value
While that quote gives insight into how the big twist came to be, what about the twist at the beginning of the pilot? Sure, it was a letdown, but would the twist at the end have worked without it?
I understand why the series chose to go in the direction it went. It allows for an entirely new story without worrying about the original’s continuity.
And with how Urman wants the mysteries to unravel, I’d say the story needs all the focus it can get, “I wanted the mystery that we’re setting out with to be 100% resolved by the end of the season. It will leave us with new problems.”
Kathy Bates’ Madeline will be a central focus rather than a plot device connecting two very different shows. And really, all the reboot is doing is treating the original series as we do in the real world.
Andy Griffith’s Matlock was a classic, but the franchise has been dormant for quite some time. Kathy Bates’ Matlock is going for the kind of optics a younger generation can get on board with.
At the same time, it completely removes the stigma of gender-swapping a beloved classic series. To be honest, if the haters come for Kathy Bates, we ride at dawn!
The Big Twist Was Born From Real Events
The big twist at the end of Matlock Season 1 Episode 1 does much more than sever any connection between the original and the reboot. It gives Madeline Matlock/Kingston the push the character needs to sell a well-conceived story.
With such specific motives for the character, we can’t help but wonder where Jennie Snyder Urman came up with such a unique approach and angle.
Luckily, the series creator has been very vocal about her inspirations, “I had read an article about a law firm that was sanctioned for hiding documents in the opioid crisis, and that stayed with me for a long time.
“I had read all of those books before Dopesick, and I remember I tried to get the rights early on, so that was all in my head at the same time.
“You never know what the story is going to be like, how the synapses are going to connect in your brain.
“Why would a woman like that want to go back into the law firm? What could be deep and meaningful enough? Then, the story unfolded. So, I pitched it from beginning to end.”
The Matlock reboot is clearly very close to the showrunner’s heart, and it shows in the meticulous way she crafted this incredible story.
Reboot Or Not, Kathy Bates’ Matlock Is A Damn Good Show
Ultimately, the twists and separation from the original will likely make this new Matlock memorable. For one, we’ll get many sides to Kathy Bates’ character.
We’ll see her Matlock persona at work, but the juicy parts will probably be when she’s home as Madeline Kingston plotting against Jacobson & Moore.
However, fans of the new show shouldn’t get too comfortable. If the network and showrunners pulled two fast ones on us already, they will likely do it again.
So, while the reboot won’t give fans of the original the shot of nostalgia they were hoping for, Matlock is still an incredible series with a worthy story to tell.
Considering the hype it has drawn from the pilot alone, there’s a good chance Kathy Bates will stick around for a while.
The showrunner speaks so highly of the actress, “It’s just a dream come true to be able to witness her process and the depth to which she goes into the scripts.
“It’s really an honor to work with her and to have her apply her rigor to the words that the writers and I have put together. It’s inspiring.
“With such a complicated character, you need someone masterful at the helm because a lot of times she’s telling the audience one thing, but I need her eyes to tell other things to the audience.”
It sounds like we have a lot of good hands at the wheel, and I’ll still be keeping my eye out for clues and Easter eggs. Regardless of the CBS series standing as a reboot or remake, it’s still a damn good show either way.
How do you feel about Matlock now, knowing the twists were always a part of the plan?
Which Madeline do you prefer? Matlock or Kingston?
Please drop a comment below to let me know, and join me again when I share more insights into your favorite shows!
Watch Matlock Online
